Awakening the Quantum Eye: Alpha Fragment

“Now the earth became formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of Elohim was hovering over the waters.” ~Genesis 1:2

In my life the ultimate questions have always been or led up to, “What is this Universe?” (“What have I been born into?”) and “Why did it come about?” (“Why am I here?”). Of course the questions were never presented so concisely as these but the gist of these questions were always present. All of my life I have been curious and these questions have at times plagued me. I recall reading in the New Testament the following words:

“Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives; he who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened.” ~Matthew 7:7-8

And,

“As for you, the anointing you received from him remains in you, and you do not need anyone to teach you. But as his anointing teaches you about all things and as that anointing is real, not counterfeit—just as it has taught you, remain in him.” ~ 1 John 2:27

During my years as a fledgling Christian—seeking the truth that sets us free—it was these two verses above that inspired me all the more to ask questions and seek answers.

What did it mean to receive this anointing, or to be “born again”?

I wondered who the Son of God was, maybe there were clues to be found in his genealogy? Son of Man, Son of David, Son of God—the product of Immaculate Conception—the Only Begotten Son of the Father, the Alpha and the Omega—the Beginning and the End. What did it all mean? That was how I saw the world as a child—through the eyes of my religion. Forever watching for pieces of the sky to fall and for the hand of God to manifest itself and impromptu His artful writing on the wall.

There is a song by Pearl Jam, which played in my mind almost daily in those fateful days—especially whenever I was alone—I still find myself humming its melody in my mind—it became for me a sort of self-fulfilling prophecy—biographical sketch of the evolution of my own consciousness, I would like to share the lyrics with you:


“A man lies in his bed in a room with no door
He waits hoping for a presence… something, anything to enter
After spending half his life searching he still felt as blank
As the ceiling at which he stared
He is alive but feels absolutely nothing
So is he?
When he was six he believed that the moon overhead followed him
By nine he had deciphered the illusion
Trading magic for fact
No trade backs...
So this is what it’s like to be an adult
If he only knew now what he knew then...
I’m open…(2x)
Come on in…(4x)
I’m open…(2x)
Come on in…(4x)
Lying sideways atop crumpled sheets and no covers he decides to
dream...
Dream up a new self for himself...”


If only I knew then what I feel I am on the verge of knowing now is a common regret that tempts my mind. But why should I regret my youth? Especially when it is becoming clearer to me everyday that the currents of embryonic Consciousness coursing through the infinite sea of primordality also courses through all of our veins, interpenetrating the blood, the water, and spirit.

Jesus is not the only Son—moreover he is what is called in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant a Noumenon (i.e. the intellectual conception of a thing as it is in itself, not as it is known through perception) expressed through manifest phenomenon. I have traded their magic for facts…no tradebacks.

“Many are called and few are chosen,” I was told by a “light shining in the darkness” as he concisely explained why the chosen are chosen—“Roots”—“Truly you are the chosen four,” he said, “One of four—Four of Twelve—and there are twelve everywhere.” Such a profound statement to absorb for a man-child in the Promised Land.

My earlier cognitive baby steps towards a deeper reality were slow and clumsy attempts motivated mostly by sporadic, casual conversations with teachers and classmates about our dreams and perceptions of this world. Turning on the evening news, reading a newspaper and assessing its penetrating analysis of our world today always seemed a bitter-sweet symphony of tragedy and hope. Then there were the thoughts and impressions of Emerson, then Thoreau, and out of the clear blue sky I was opened to Persig’s Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance—to the ponderings of his Phaedras.

All of this created the foreground of my perceptions…leading me to the flame that sparked the torch of my consciousness and led me to acknowledge the sanctity of the whispers of thought spontaneously generated within my own consciousness. Could this be the anointing which guides us to enlightenment by the differential logic of this ethereal realm? Or was I “reading” too much into things, as many have so often casually warned me? The darkness and the light were my initial teachers. My on-going search for truth has so far led me to the writing of this book, which I feel is best described through the words of the late Katherine Anne Porter’s poem on Memory:


“Of the three dimensions of Time, only the past is real in the absolute sense that it has occurred, the future is only a concept, and the present is that fateful split second in which all action takes place. One of the most disturbing habits of the human mind is its willful and destructive forgetting of whatever in its past does not flatter or confirm its present point of view. I must very often refer far back in time to seek the meaning or explanation of today’s smallest event, and I have long since lost the power to be astonished at what I find there. This constant exercise of memory seems to be the chief occupation of my mind, and all my experience seems to be simply memory, with continuity, marginal notes, constant revision and comparison of one thing with another. Now and again, thousands of memories converge, harmonize, arrange themselves around a central idea in a coherent form, and write a story.”


The Never-Ending Story…

“Darkness and light were my initial teachers…”

By such willful design, two currents spiraled round one another drawn by polar affinity. Each alone were neutral, but in close proximity their internal forces were complimentary…thus tendrils of desire flowed purposely between them. Spiraling ever closer, each causing the effect of the other, their circular dance became a symmetry of circular charges in spherical embrace…like a love story I have seen so many times on the silver screen and read about in fairy tales. A romantic adventure…ever becoming?
But really, an emerging universal span, universal plan, is just that…the passion of two complimentary forces…of Inertia (i.e. Physics—the tendency of a body to resist acceleration; the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force.), the purity of what we call “free will” engaging in intimate experience, bound by polar affinity/attraction…the very essence of what we call “Love.” In unity, they present as a singular condition, as a self-bounded or in-bounded system of self-experience, a singular mind in self comprehension—self-revelation—self-willed. But of course, the components of this duality are only extensions, (waves of primordality, of inertia rising up and meeting each other to form a “twist”), of the greater condition of Primary Consciousness…of the Absolute Wholeness of the Multiverse, within which Universal Spans, (each a plan part of a greater plan), are thought into existence and dwell.

One might ask then, “What is the Origin of all things? What is the Original ‘Thing’ from which all of Existence has emerged?” On the surface this may seem like a simple question, and all one has to do to find an answer is consult the likes of a Carl Sagan or Stephen Hawking. However, upon doing so I found their explanations lacking something. Salt, perhaps? Within the scope of our limited neurological perception, the simple answer may only be found through a complicated path of deductive reasoning, for the origin/foundation of Existence does not dwell in space of time as supposed by men such as Sagan and Hawking, although their intentions are noble. Rather, it is itself a singular condition without size or shape, out of which what we perceive as “Space-Time” and “Dimension” are constructed.

After watching such thought-provoking movies such as the Matrix trilogies, as well as other films that have questioned the nature of reality we intuitively are inclined to ask at various levels, “Does it exists?” Even as a child we are lulled to sleep by our mother’s voice singing,

“Row, row, row, your boat gently down the stream, merrily, merrily, merrily, merrily life is but a dream…”

So, is it a dream? Do “Time-Space” and “Dimension exist? Most certainly it does, for here we are formed of it, talking and reading about it. But, as the sweet lullaby intuits it is not as we perceive because we interpret its appearance through our senses and formulate its qualities through our brain and therefore electro-chemically reconstruct and translate it into an image of dimensionality that we can make sense of…as our neurologically interpreted “World”.

This notion is naturally upsetting to many of us. Certainly my girlfriend shrugs whenever I mention it in conversation. I suppose it exposes how much or how little we truly understand about ourselves and our reality—depriving us of a feeling of sanctity and control. This feeling is not necessary, for this does not mean that what we perceive is not real, but only that the way in which we see things is not the actual way in which they exist. If what we perceived was not real—this would mean that we were in a prison for our minds as depicted in the Matrix movies—then those who are enlightened would advocate violent revolution against the agents enslaving humanity. This however, is not the case—those who are enlightened have always advocated peace and expressed the undivided nature of ourselves with our environment and the oneness of consciousness.

Simply put, if we perceive an interaction between two objects, (a tennis racquet hits a ball), the interaction exists, but the objects are actually comprised of unified standing wave forms, (harmonic vibrations of information, translating), of Inertia/Consciousness, undivided from each other through the Dynamic Condition/Totality of Consciousness, that “Existence” actually is. A good example of this would be the radio waves, which carry and translate our voices through the medium of the atmosphere and even the vacuum of space undivided as various wavelengths (i.e. bandwidths/radio stations) which are in turn received by our radios and translated again into discernable sounds, music, talk, and annoying commercial breaks. Even if you turn your dial to 107.5 WGCI the over stations are still undivided, you have simply chosen to listen to one of the frequencies of an undivided wavelength.

Space and Time are not separate phenomena as we perceive, but are representative of a singular process in dynamic self-interaction, (of which we are a dynamic part), that Human Beings and other life forms perceptually split into neurological translations of spatial extensions and temporal spans. The processes that we call “Energy and Matter are further configurations of this singular state of what I call “Inertial Being.” We have developed a neurological picture of our world out of which has evolved our individual notions of Space, Time, Energy, and Matter, and the physical relativity’s between them. But at the deepest level of reality, where Existence is undivided, Matter and Energy blend together with Space and Time as a Single Conscious Entity that exists in its own way regardless of our perceptions of it. This is not by any means a new concept, and the fact that it is indeed an ancient concept further demonstrates its relevance to us today. Why? Because it demonstrates how the Single Consciousness has continually existed and manifested itself throughout the neurological perceptions of Space and Time. This book will explore these expressions and its many avatars, step by step like as if up a pyramid, and once we reach the observatory we will look beyond our cerebral illusions into that simpler foundation, into the Quantum level of the Dynamic Being of the “Fluxion”…out of which we ourselves and all that we perceive are generated. As we are accustomed to perceiving our world through the neurological imageries of our senses and brain, we can only interpret the neurologically generated written word as presented here in our “classical” manner. There are few words available to describe the nature of the hidden, “Quantum realm” in “classical terminology”, but the underlying structure and meaning of this deeper reality can be envisioned through enhanced explanations of why we experience “World” as we do. (Hence the use within this book of “classical terms” in unorthodox ways).

Thus, we will abandon our classical, exoteric, interpretations of Existence within this treatise, as we will use them as translators of the deeper, esoteric reality. It is written:

“We have much to say about this, but it is hard to explain because you are slow to learn. In fact, though by this time you ought to be teachers, you need someone to teach you the elementary truths of God’s word (logion) all over again. You need milk, not solid food! Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about what is right. But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.” ~Hebrews 5:11-14

So, for the sake of clarity we will work with the terms “Space, Time, Matter and Energy”, and the relationships between them, but we will also continually be aware of the influence of the dynamics of a deeper underlying, unifying process. Occasionally the translations will lead into perceptual paradox, but we will work through and dispel them as we reveal their underlying cause.

Ultimately we will recognize the Unity of Consciousness that Existence is…and at once envision our own relative meaning and purpose.

The Synthesis of Quantum Existence into Classical Reality

We do not directly see Existence as it is, we see a translated picture arranged through the molecules of our brain that we infer as Space, Time, Motion, Shape, and Form. To get a sense of this, place a small object in front of you, a needle perhaps, and then will it to move. It doesn’t move. In the film the Matrix the hero, Neo, encounters a young boy who appears to be able to bend a needle with his mind alone. He offers Neo the needle and challenges him to attempt the same task saying, “Try not to think of it as bending the needle itself, only that it is you that bends…” (or something to that affect?). In essence the boy was right. The reason why your needle did not move is because it is not where you think it is. Listen. You are directing your will towards an “object” that is only a representation, an image on the “projection screen” of your mind. If you cannot bend a needle how can you move mountains? In an esoteric teaching the figure Jesus admonished his followers saying:

“O unbelieving and perverse generation…how long shall I stay with you? How long shall I put up with you? …You have so little faith. I tell you the truth, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible to you.” ~Matthew 17:17,20-12

And again elsewhere,

“I tell you the truth, that if you have faith and do not doubt…you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer.”~ Matthew 21:21-22


How can we the needle? And even more oddly, how can we move mountains? The problem lies in the direction of our eye…it is so misleading. You look at the needle and say, “There it is—out there—in front of me”, but how are you looking? Another esoteric saying attributed to Jesus on this matter is:

“The eye is the lamp of the body. If your eyes are good, your whole body will be full of light. But if your eyes are bad, your whole body will be full of darkness. If then the light within you is darkness, how great is that darkness!” ~ Matthew 6:22-23

So how are you looking? With the internal light or the external light? The out there is an illusion…a picture that you have constructed within your own mind of the impulses generated by the Inertial Totality/ “Environment” that you are undivided from. You have made of this “code” a cerebral image that you can make sense of, that takes the forms of “Distances”, “Time Spans”, “Velocities”, and “Dimensionality”—but that is only your neurological interpretation. So when it comes to the task of bending the needle (or moving the mountain) you are not directing your will towards the object itself, only at an image that you have constructed of it. Now lift your hand. It does move. That is because you are not willing an image to move. You did not have to look at your hand to move it. In this case you moved the actual “object”. Now look at your hand and will it to move. It does not move because you are not directly applying your will to it. We can see the subtlety of this exercise. I will make a Jedi out of you yet pada wan (a bit of Star Wars humor).

Part of your Consciousness, which is undivided from the Totality of Inertia/Consciousness that Existence is, lies between your hand and your brain and the will that causes your hand to move acts directly and instantaneously upon itself and then you see the reconstructed image of your hand “moving” through neurological time and space. You cannot will your hand to move by willing the image of it, as the image is not your hand. And of course, at the perceptual level of our Classical, Neurological World Reality, it is true that the pathway for your Consciousness to act upon your hand runs from your cerebral cortex, (a construct of Inertia/Consciousness) down through the nerve fibers between it and you hand, (more constructs of Inertia/Consciousness), but this is the way in which your Localized Consciousness has created a perceptual path for itself, (a path that is convenient through the illusions of your body), to act upon itself…based upon your cerebral interpretation of synthesized reality. Take for example the seemingly paranormal phenomena of “phantom limbs.” This is a rare but scientifically documented phenomenon which occurs in amputees who report feeling sensations locally in limbs that no longer exist! This subject is so fascinating that I could write at least 1,000 pages on the subject without exhausting all of the testimonies validating its eerie existence. Yet, those of us who have all of our limbs and phalanges do not need to testify to the validity of our cerebral interpretations of synthesized reality. Moreover, if we reach out and touch the needle in front of us, we can now move it because we are acting on the level of reality that we are accustomed to. Those with the phantom limbs cannot move the needle with their phantom limb only because they are not accustomed to it although they possess an overwhelming intuition prompting them otherwise. Our Consciousness has set up a series of images that it can conveniently work through in a cerebral reality, which allows through illusion, one image—your hand—to move another image—the needle.

But the actual hidden process of what is really going on is that your Consciousness, undivided from the needle itself, (and undivided from the Totality of all Consciousness), is communicating with itself, (an undivided interaction between you and the needle as an extension of your Consciousness), that in your “cerebral vision” causes the needle to move via your hand…because your “vision” is through a cerebral reconstruction of the event.

(You must ask yourself: “Why can I move my hand and not the object without touching it?” The answer will come back: “I am attached to my hand.” Your notion of being “attached” is your notion of the instantaneous reality of your Consciousness at the Quantum level, where Space and Time do not exist.)

The first stumbling block

And at the Quantum level you are also attached to the needle, but because you perceive indirectly through your body and brain, through a cerebral reconstruction of events, your direct instantaneous attachment to it is perceptually interrupted and you are convinced that this object is “some distance” from you, but that “distance” is only a projected image on your “cerebral view screen”. “Distance” is only a cerebral representation of our inability to immediately affect an object through conventional neural function. Think of it this way; “distance” is a distinct aspect of the difference between objects, an aspect like color, shape, or texture…and each of these are neurological interpretations of a deeper reality…and because neurological interpretations are interruptions of direct experience, “distance” is therefore also a representation of coded perception—of synthesized experience…and that my friends is what “space” truly is.

The Totality of “Existence as it is”, Primary Consciousness, has constructed of itself, (borrowing a term used in the science of Optics) “Neural Perceptors”, (such as you and I and other life forms), that enable it to experience itself in an analytical way, as a furtherance of its attempt to answer the question of its own existence, (to seek equilibrium within itself). The famous William Shakespeare himself through his version of Hamlet’s soliloquy encapsulated the darker side of the cyclical nature of this “divine” experience from the human perspective:

“…To be, or not to be: that is the question:
Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous fortune,
Or to take arms against a sea of troubles,
And by opposing end them? To die: to sleep;
No more; and by a sleep to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, 'tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish'd. To die, to sleep;
To sleep: perchance to dream: ay, there's the rub;
For in that sleep of death what dreams may come
When we have shuffled off this mortal coil,
Must give us pause: there's the respect
That makes calamity of so long life;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of time,
The oppressor's wrong, the proud man's contumely,
The pangs of despised love, the law's delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his quietus make
With a bare bodkin? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary life,
But that the dread of something after death,
The undiscover'd country from whose bourn
No traveller returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution…”
Is sicklied o'er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pitch and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action.-- Soft you now!
The fair Ophelia! Nymph, in thy orisons
Be all my sins remember'd.

Hence, our gray matter is constructed to operate at the “classical level of reality”, (willfully suppressing perception of the “undiscover’d country”) and our notion of “distance” as a physically structured neurological adaptation, enables us to function within such a cumbersome reality in a systematic, analytical way, (If an “object” is “here” or “there”, we can do “this” or “that”). This does not mean that our perception of “distance” does not represent a true condition, but that condition is not what we think it is, as it is an enfoldment of Consciousness whose qualities we perceive and translate in a restricted way, and ultimately at the Quantum level is actually a perspective by Primary Consciousness of an undivided aspect of itself. If you could perceive at this “Quantum” level, that small object in front of you would appear as a matrix of vibrational “thought”, as interactive perspectives of the Wholeness of Being, from which your own thought is undivided. Notions of “cerebral cortex and nerve fiber pathways” would be meaningless, as your direct connection, at this perceptual level, would manifest as instantaneous effect! Hence, we would at once be able to bend the needle and move mountains!

If we could bypass the “synthesizer” of your senses and brain, even in a limited way, you would at once realize your undividedness from all things. Simply, the cause of existence is within you and the same cause is within the object in front of you, but because the cause is differentiated through its own self encounter, the phenomenon that is you and the phenomenon that is the object are different, but still undivided. At the root level however, the “cause” is the same. Your body and brain is a construct of Primary Consciousness, an enfoldment of the Totality of Consciousness that you perceive as the environment surrounding you that the needle, the mountain, are also a part of. Thus your body and brain re an interrupting interface, (a device that Primary Consciousness has constructed of itself that it may, in a special but limited way, perceive through), that polarizes the Wholeness/Instantaneity of Primary Consciousness into a duality, and then a multiplicity of perceptions and interactions, all thoughts of a singular mind in multiple levels of introspection. The small object to be moved and the hand that would move it, both of which are part of your Consciousness, must reach an “agreement”, have already “agreed” before you are neurologically aware…absent of Time and Space—and then it “moves” according to your cerebral reconstruction of a synthesized “event”.

Let us take into account the Electron Twins: Though they may be light years apart, when one is caused to spin left the other is instantly caused to spin right. The agreement between them is absent of Time and Space…absent of synthesized reality. That which we perceive as the speed of light and all other speeds below, is the complication, the enfoldment, the interpenetration and reciprocity of the instantaneity of a deeper reality…the intermix of thoughts of a Unified Mind. And we perceive these interpolarizations of foundational reality as modifications of its instantaneity…as Matter, Energy, Velocity, Space, and Time…each through our own unique perspective. All “Velocities” therefore are translations of the action/experience by the instantaneity/simultaneity of Inertia upon itself. A Wholeness is always instantaneous/simultaneous to itself, always attached to itself, but sentient parts of the Wholeness, (such as ourselves), must interpret the Wholeness through its, (and our own), convolutions and thus perceive it sequentially…over “Time” and through “Space”. So Existence is not what we imagine it to be, as we synthetically reconstruct it and the “look” through the synthesis and believe this to be real…which it is, but only on a cerebral level. We therefore live in a world of illusion, a “neurological” reality that only partly reveals the nature of Existence to us. We intuit this naturally, yet attach to this hidden reality a negative stigma—“the dread of something after death, the undiscover'd country from whose bourn no traveller returns” as Shakespeare so aptly puts it. It “puzzles the will and makes us rather bear those ills we have” in this “mortal coil” we call life.

My mother once asked the simple yet profound question: “Why did Jesus have to suffer the way that he did?” I now reinterpret that question in lieu of Hamlet’s Soliloquy as:

“Why did Jesus suffer in this reality when he could have flown “to others that we know not of?” Here is an inadvertent answer to that question attributed to the Apostle Paul in a letter to the Church at Corinth:


“If I speak in tongues of men and of angels, but have not love I am only a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal. If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and I have a faith that can move mountains, but have not love, I am nothing. If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing. Love is patient, love is kind. It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud. It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs. Love does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth. It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres. Love never fails. But where there are prophecies, they will cease; where there are tongues, they will be stilled; where there is knowledge, it will pass away. For we know in part and we prophesy in part, but when perfection comes, the imperfect disappears. When I was a child, I talked like a child, I thought like a child, I reasoned like a child. When I became a man, I put childish ways behind me. Now we see but a poor reflection as in a mirror; then we shall see face to face. Now I know in part; then I shall know fully, even as I am fully known.”~ 1 Corinthians 13:1-12


The Cloaking of the Quantum Realm through Classical Perceptions

Ok…although perhaps you might agree that what you have read so far may have some merit as an imaginative work of fiction, the hairs may rise on the back of your neck if I try to persuade you that what has been implied is true. (Even Albert Einstein questioned the instantaneous relationship of the electron twins, but experiment after experiment has proven that such spontaneity exists). Our cerebral interpretations are protected by electrochemical resistances to perceptions that cannot be directly experienced through our senses. To demonstrate this fact the New Testament writers project the figure of Paul in a situation where he is explaining to a profound and esoteric teachings of the “the kingdom of heaven”, let us see exactly what happens when a young man’s electrochemical resistances to transcendent perceptions kicks in:

“…Paul spoke to the people and, because he intended to leave the next day, kept on talking until midnight. There were many lamps in the upstairs room where we were meeting. Seated in a window was a young man named Eutychus, who was sinking into a deep sleep as Paul talked on and on. When he was sound asleep, he fell to the ground from the third story and was picked up dead. Paul went down, threw himself on the young man and put his arms around him. “Don’t be alarmed,” he said. “He’s alive!” Then he went upstairs again and broke bread and ate. After talking until daylight, he left. The people took the young man home alive and were greatly comforted.” ~ Acts 20:7-12

Although the following event never actually happened (a controversial subject I will address in great detail later on) the “acts,” “events,” “teachings”, and “parables”, of the Old and New Testament are merely thought-tools, constructs. When used properly they are akin to other “classical terms” which can be used as translators of the deeper reality of the hidden, Quantum Realm. Yet, even as your eyes continue to scan each sequential letter, I know there are those who have just experienced resistance to the idea that the Bible is merely a parabolic thought tool. By definition a parable is a short moral story. Yet, the definition does not illuminate fully what I am trying to convey. Only by probing words synonymous with parable can we fully appreciate the scope of what I am saying (those of us who are religiously inclined to believe that the Bible is the Word of God that is). Words that are synonymous with parable are: myth, cryptogram, falsehood, fish story, knot, and allegory, just to name a few. Two words that are antonyms of parable are actually what many perceive the Bible to be—fact and history, of which the Bible is neither. It is merely a construct.

We, no matter what your faith, creed, or ethnicity, are actually all hardwired into the perception of “Classical Reality”. Religion is merely one of the oldest methods used to deliberately cloak the Quantum Realm from our Quantum Eye. That is why the concept and use of “faith” is enigmatic to many, as faith in its pure form, (faith at the Quantum level) is a concept that bypasses Space and Time. All of the laws of Classical Physics…and all of the formulas that we have discovered however (whether they be theological or scientific), are actually our own cerebral “checks and balances” that actually prevent our direct perception of the Quantum realm…that also enable us to perceive a “Classical World Reality”. As we interpret in one way, we have trouble interpreting simultaneously in the other. These impediments exist as part of our own electrochemical neurological construct. Thus all of the mathematical equations that we have discovered of our World Reality are already contained within the electrochemical makeup of our neurological network as its “physicality” that we perceive as the sequentiality/evolution of cause and then effect…instead of cause and then effect. Let us pause for a moment to digest all of this.

Now what is “physicality”…but the convolution, a constructed level, a complication, a “mortal coil”, of the deeper reality from which we ourselves are generated? We wake up, and open our eyes and “see” a world, and then we go about figuring out why the world appears as it does by going back into our own brain, (as this IS where the “world images” exists), to deduce the symbolic representations of the Code of Existence that we receive through our senses, and then we neurologically translate them into a mathematical language of words and numbers that we may transmit to others. Notice that I included “words” as part of the mathematical language. If you view the written word on a computer screen, as I am while I am typing this, it is only there because the computer has constructed—or been programmed with—a series of mathematical formulas to generate each letter. If you write with a pen or speak, this is only possible because your brain likewise “computes” your thoughts into mathematical expressions—symbols on paper, papyrus, or symbolic sounds—that others can interpret and express in a similar way. What we call a “word” is actually an algebraic expression of a “mathematical thought”. Thus, to “speak” is to express our thoughts in algebraic/symbolic terms, (that is why different languages can express the same thoughts)…and as small children we do this before we learn to “count”—hence all that we express are integrations of mathematical equations that are already within us, as our “physical” neurological makeup, undivided from the mathematical Totality of the “environment” of which we are a part. In the broader view, all expressions/patterns of Existence are algebraic representations of the Singular Condition that Primary Consciousness is, illusions of the “Noumenon”, (Fluxion),--representations, as its self-generated “phenomenon”.

There are theologians who have claimed they have discovered a “Bible Code” which seems to predict future events…only after they have occurred. Simultaneously, there are opponents to this claim which have used the same methods—using computers and advanced algorithms—to achieve the same results in secular texts of equal length such as Moby Dick (of which I still have a book report due on from the sixth grade!). Pythagoras would have scoffed at the blindness of these so-called scholars, for how easily have they forgotten that “all things are numbers”. The skeptics are even worse because they fail to see the implications of their own discoveries.

So we see, because of the way our brains are constructed, we are limited and induced through the “classical areas” of it to interpret and express this symbolism in “classical terms” (whether scientific or theological). A novel use of Ohms Law gives us a “classical” insight into this limitation:

Quoted From the Encyclopedia Britannica Website

“Alternate statements of Ohm’s law are that the current I in a conductor equals the potential V across the conductor divided by the resistance of the conductor, or simply I amps = V volts/R resistance, and that the potential difference across a conductor equals the product of the current in the conductor and its resistance, V = IR. In a circuit in which the potential difference, or voltage, is constant, the current may be decreased by adding more resistance or increased by removing some resistance…”



(Ok, if you are not into electrical theory the above may seem like a foreign language, but when reading this we nevertheless get a vague feeling of familiarity because of that key word—“resistance”—as in the resistance of an extension cord when too many appliances are plugged into it, it expresses its resistance by getting hot. Or as in the resistance of our neurological circuits that prevent our perception of a non-classical phenomenon. We are generally unable to perceive such phenomenon directly, or we get perplexed when we are asked to visualize the phenomenon indirectly).

Quote continued….

“With modifications, Ohm’s law also applies to alternating-current circuits, in which the relation between the voltage and the current is more complicated than for direct currents. Precisely because the current is varying, besides resistance, other forms of opposition to the current arise, called reactance. The combination of resistance and reactance is called impedence, Z.”

(More words of familiarity—“modify, react and impede”. Let’s look more closely at the above statements as applied to the “code/current” of Existence, received by our senses and circulated through our brain: we receive varying impulses that impinge upon our senses that we interpret through our brain as our “World”. The circuitry of our brain filters through its reactance, all Quantum phenomena in “the Human condition”. Our cerebral reality therefore, is one of limitation…as indicated by the limiting terms that we use to express it—“here, there, then, when, it, you, I, they, those, etc.” Hence our perceptions are impeded/modified and thus limited to classical events. This is truly one of the threads in the cloak indeed.)

Quote continued….

“When the impedance, equivalent to the ratio of voltage to current, in an alternating current circuit is constant, a common occurrence, Ohm’s law is applicable.
For example,

V/I = Z.”
Note: Z is the symbol for impedance:
1. Symbol Z A measure of the total opposition to current flow in an alternating current circuit, made up of two components, ohmic resistance and reactance, and usually represented in complex notation as Z = R + iX, where R is the ohmic resistance and X is the reactance.
2. An analogous measure of resistance to an alternating effect, as the resistance to vibration of the medium in sound transmission.


(Here the familiar word is “constant”, as in the Continuity of Be-ing. The impulses that we receive are continuous, and we therefore continuously “react” to maintain continuity of our “World Vision”, and even deeper, our “mortal coil,” perhaps this is what it means—“to let go.” So in this sense, Ohm’s law governs our interpretations of our “Classical World” by continually impeding our perceptions of a deeper reality. When interpreting through our gray matter (V/I), we are always at “Z”.)

Quote continued…

“With further modifications Ohm’s law has been extended to the constant ration of the magneto-motive force to the magnetic flux in a magnetic circuit. The reluctance of a magnetic circuit is analogous to the resistance of an electric circuit. Reluctance depends on the geometrical and material properties of the circuit that offer opposition to the presence of magnetic flux. Reluctance of a given part of a magnetic circuit is proportional to its length and inversely proportional to its cross-sectional area and a magnetic property of the given material called its permeability.”

End of Quote.

As we read through the above, even if we have never studied electromagnetic theory, we get a sense of understanding the gist of the statements involved, because we now recognize the brain as a devise…through which we each as Consciousness interpret our world in a limited way. Our brain however, because it is ultimately constructed of Quantum forces, does occasionally permit a non-classical view into the Quantum realm…if we know how to look. Within the deeper recesses of our brain Consciousness often gets a glimpse of an underlying reality. Here, Ohm’s law is less restrictive in that the complications of our chemical circuitry may occasionally offer spontaneous alternatives to the checks and balances of the cerebral level, enabling us to “see” beyond classical reality, (hence our ability to subjectively experience and deduce instantaneous “intangibles”; dejavu, precognition, synchronicity, even “phantom limbs”).

Through our pursuit of knowledge, we have gone deeper into the labyrinth. With each bit of knowledge gained, we are led to a more fundamental understanding, hence the interpretation of Einstein’s Relativity that furthered our comprehension of Quantum mechanics, of which I am an avid subscriber. And of course, this curiosity is generated from the foundational level of Existence…as “curiosity/creativity” are but translations of the transcendent force of Primary Consciousness seeking equilibrium within its own Wholeness…seeking the answer to the question of its Existence. The apparent contradiction between Quantum and Classical perception is that we are focused through limited cerebral interpretations that blind us from the vibrancy of a deeper reality. As you read through The Deadly Light and other works of this kind, we instinctively invoke our “classical wisdom” and discrimination at every juncture…and this impedes our understanding tremendously. Even in grade school when being taught simple mathematics we were resistant, as we would have preferred to throw our textbooks out of the window and gone out and chased the pretty girls around the playground rather than absorb those alien concepts that were being thrust upon our simple perceptions, (no?…maybe it was just me then…).

Well anyway, what I am getting at is, rather than automatically taking a “classical” position against a statement of underlying, hidden reality, (which is perfectly natural), it is better to withhold judgment until a concept has been made clear. If you are thinking to yourself that by issuing this disclaimer I am myself taking a “classical” position of pre-judgment toward the receptiveness of this reader, know that as a form of a teacher, or as I prefer it chronicler it is my instinctive duty to not loose one of my readers but to guide us all towards a casual ground for future discussion and healthy debate on the matters discussed. So, it is more a matter of pre-caution stemmed from preparedness rather than prejudice towards you—the reader. If we acknowledge this we will find that our grasp of Foundational Existence runs more smoothly as we gain tacit understanding together.

Have you ever played “Connect the dots”? What is actually “connecting”? As we connect our tacit understanding to those dots, the underlying picture eventually reveals itself through “our” connection to it. We illuminate it into perceptual being through our conscious action upon it, such action being a reciprocative simultaneous effort between it and we as its consciousness and our consciousness are undividedly interactive, as it and we are simply one consciousness acting upon itself…and then we look at it in our Classical way through our neuro-synthetic reconstruction and say, “Oh, it’s a pyramid”…and then we accept this translation as an ordinary part of our Classical World and leave it lying on the table…over there.

Let’s do an algebraic experiment that at first offers interpretive resistance within our perception of the Classical World:

(a+b)2 is equivalent to a2+2ab+b2.

Now, at first glance this seems preposterous. How can it be that two numbers, one added to the other and then the sum squared can equal the products of these same numbers, multiplied by each other and then multiplied by 2 and then each squared, further added to this sum? It seems illogical, and if you had never before been exposed to this mathematical curiosity and were asked to just accept it as truth, your reaction would be to resist this “truth”, as classical, neurological impedance.

But let’s do the math: let a=3 and let b=4, (you can substitute any numbers you wish),

(a+b)2 = 3+4 which = 7 then squared which = 49.

And next, the other side of this “truth”: a2+2ab+b2 works out to the following:

A2 = 9 and the next, a times b = 12 times 2 = 24 and finally, b2 = 16.


Add 9+24+16 and the sum is 49. Now, if you are staring at the above, still in disbelief, searching for some mistake, be assured that it is correct. (Substitute any other numbers of your choosing for a and b and it will still work out). This simple mathematical condition (taught to me by Mr. Kai Henniman) us representative of a Noumenon expressing its Phenomena, of a Foundational Entity expressing within the view of its own consciousness, an expanded complication of itself, as a “World” above the substructure. (In later chapters we will explore such Equations as they reveal Noumenons in Political and Social Behavior of groups and individuals whose motives are “hidden” to bring into the light the true Phenomena driving their motive actions). With a bit of effort though, we can overcome our perceptual resistance and come to understand and accept this simple two-part equivalency.

If we complicate this equation further however, say 3 more levels up, then the equivalency between the foundation and the 5th level would seem impossible, but would nevertheless exist. As a student Political Science, one who uses such equations to express complex phenomenon in political and social spheres is called a Conspiracy Theorist. Naturally, this title carries along with it a negative stigma/connotation which in turn automatically invokes resistance in our perceptions of such an individuals credulity. However, Classical Existence generated from Quantum Existence is just that: A Singular Consciousness compounded into many rational and diversified levels of self-experience, and at our level, compounded into Neural Perceptors such as we, “IT” interprets through our neurological circuitry, as a Synthesized Environmental Cosmological World Reality—or as it has now become chic to call it—The Matrix. Ah, yes, that word, and its modern applications to the “world” in which we live. The Wachowski Brothers could not have chosen a more appropriate “time” to release such a film.

Neurological Nothingness…

Let us now imagine that time and space do not exist as we perceive, but are only cerebral reconstructions of a singular condition, of a Totality without size, but nevertheless experiencing itself, of which we are each an undivided part. There are no “physical things”, (except undivided differential standing waves of interactive Inertia); hence no space is required to contain them. What is now left? We cannot see “IT” because we are accustomed to interpreting reality through neurological “Time” and “Space”. Without our cerebral reconstruction of “Existence as it is”, we are unable to formulate a physical “IT” to see. A physical “IT” is a thing and there are no physical “things” to be revealed to our senses without space and time. We might at first conceive an absence, but only an absence can only be formulated in relation to an existent environment, so where there is no space or time, nothing can be absent. We have to look deeper and postulate that a condition that I shall call the “Iota Existence of Primary Consciousness”, is the singular foundation of what we call “Nothingness” and also of our synthesized “Reality”…and that there is nothing more than this self-interactive condition and that the Totality of this condition is the only “IT” there is…as a Conscious Mind constructed of self-interactive Inertia, undivided from itself, infinitely interpreting itself. It is driven through its own self-interpretation/self-representation by its own transcendence to emanate as every pattern of existence that we neurologically perceive and into realms beyond our perception…hence the ancient saying goes:

“So we fix our eyes not on what is seen, but on what is unseen. For what is seen is temporary, but what is unseen is eternal…” ~2 Corinthians 4:18

And finally, if viewed from within itself by sentient/neural constructs of itself, (such as we), it cannot see itself as it is, and therefore interprets itself sequentially through our synthesis of Space and Time…hence the ancient sayings:

“I will destroy the wisdom of the wise; the intelligence of the intelligent I will frustrate.”

And,
“Where is the wise man? Where is the scholar? Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world…”

And more poignantly,

“…For since in the wisdom of God the world through its wisdom did not know him...” ~ 1 Corinthians 1:18-21


The Primary Consciousness, or as it is called in the epistle of John—“Logos”, does not dwell in Space and Time, but is constructed of a single quality that is simultaneously and instantaneously a Willful, self-interactive equation, a formulation of on-going thought, of Self-Experiential Inertia, the origin of all formulas self-actualizing, that is neither Space or Time, but emanating diversified attributes of itself—through itself—that we who are woven of it, cerebrally reconstruct into our “Classical Reality”. What our scholars/science calls “Space-Time” is the dynamic self-interaction of this “Equation”, a living, thinking, self-interactive mind, seeking to solve itself, analogous to a chemical reaction that must continue until it is dissipated, (that can never dissipate), that we neurologically interpret as a sphere of Time, Space, Energy, Matter, and Consciousness expanding into itself.

And here I perceive an apparent, glaring inconsistency…for how can there be continuity without “time,” and how is it that those Singularities mentioned earlier are “date stamped”? Well, as it turns out, what we interpret as “Time” is one of several perceptions/qualities of Inertia itself!

Qualities of Inertia
Inertia as the “Fluxion”, by its Tension of Wholeness upon itself diversifies within itself, forming compounded levels that result in the creation of Neurological Perceptors, (such as we), that provide Inertia with localized perceptions of itself, provoking a view of “environmental” sequentiality: interpretations of volumes and durations, in short, dimensions of “physicality”. When we interpret a “Time Span”, we make a neurological synthesis of the difference between convolutions of Inertia—those convolutions being “Time”/Inertia wrapped up! And yes, this sounds like “Space” between “objects”, such “Space”, Inertia less convoluted. So, when we interpret unwrapped Inertia, we interpret from two neurological perspectives—one as distance, the other as temporality—and “wrapped”, as objects of “mass”. But it is all one thing, interpreted from within and of itself in an infinite variety of ways. Within the context of “atomic particles”, we deduce that all atoms consist of Electrons, Protons, and Neutrons, and depending upon the numbers of such particles in an atom it has identity as this element or that, but all atoms are made of the same stuff—made of varying convolutions of Inertia/ “Time”/Consciousness. Such a medium, undivided from itself, whose “elasticity”/ self-interpretability, allows it to “fold” upon itself in an infinity of ways, may present itself to the senses of a life form as an infinity of patterns.

Now add to this that the life form itself is an undivided part of this same Wholeness, and perceptions of infinite convolutions of the “same stuff” become a vibrant continuous reality…that reality consisting of “Objects” existing in “Space” over “Time”…that reality consisting of the Mind of the “Cosmos”…divided by the Mind of the Life Form. This esoteric notion is revealed in the New Testament epistle as the “Logos”, it I believed to have been written in about the year 90 AD, it says:


“In the beginning was the Logos, and the Logos was with God, and the Logos was God. He was with God in the beginning. Through him all things were made; without him nothing was made that has been made. In him was life, and that life was the light of men. The light shines in the darkness, but the darkness has not understood it.” ~ John 1:1-5


What exactly is Logos? Because I will be discussing this in depth in later chapters for now I will simply give the American Heritage Dictionary definitions of Logos:

1. Philosophy.
a. In pre-Socratic philosophy, the principle governing the cosmos, the source of this principle, or human reasoning about the cosmos.
b. Among the Sophists, the topics of rational argument or the arguments themselves.
c. In Stoicism, the active, material, rational principle of the cosmos; nous. Identified with God, it is the source of all activity and generation and is the power of reason residing in the human soul.
2. Judaism.
a. In biblical Judaism, the word of God, which itself has creative power and is God's medium of communication with the human race.
b. In Hellenistic Judaism, a hypostasis associated with divine wisdom.
3. Christianity. In Saint John's Gospel, especially in the prologue (1:1-14), the creative word of God, which is itself God and incarnate in Jesus. Also called Word.

As I was reading the above definitions for logos I came across the working definition for logo—“A programming language developed for teaching young children. Elementary exercises involve drawing geometric shapes.” How appropriate! What is the Periodic Chart of Elements if not a programming language developed for teaching us the varying convolutions of “Time”/Inertia which form an infinity of geometric patterns?

Yes, there is a mathematical equation intrinsic to all observation affecting the Wholeness and the Life Form as part of the Wholeness, because ultimately it is all one solitary condition of Inertia/Consciousness diversifying within and of itself. And here finally, we conceive the formula for Manifest Destiny—a living function—the Calculus! And how?—A life form generated of the Wholeness…is the Wholeness, perceiving/ “moving” itself through the Life Form, and through such perception/”motion”, the Wholeness differentially develops through each Life Form a sense of self, and as each “self” moves/perceives, it instantaneously affects the Continuum that generates it…and “moves” the world from which it extends! Any part of an undivided Wholeness experiences the Transcendence of the Wholeness…as cause always lies within its effect. In simpler terms—the nature of the Wholeness arises with the Wholeness! That is the character of a dynamic function, which is constituted of the components it affects. This simple law, the first law—the nature of a function, the nature of Primary Consciousness—once understood, may be used to describe every aspect of Existence and may also be used to describe the “creation” of Existence itself! Above, through and below every event, pattern, action, “motion” that we perceive and beyond our perception—there is a mathematical function—a thought of Existence of itself. All of the functions generated by the Totality constitute the dynamism—the life of the Totality…and above, through and below this, there is that spark that gets and keeps the ball rolling—the transcendence of tension intrinsic to the Wholeness that arises with the Wholeness—that is its nature.

If you still don’t see how that transcendence comes about, don’t worry, it will be revealed completely within this chapter. Because we are extensions of the undivided Totality of Inertia, of Existence, we observe it through its convolutions, sequentially, but we may also interpret its concurrency/simultaneity as we may now begin to grasp the idea of the function of a Wholeness. Imagine the Cosmos as a sphere undividedly, but differentially interactive, but when we look through it, we see/analyze it in a fragmented way—we perceptually break it up to more easily integrate, achieve and survive within our “World”—our “mortal coil.” Those “date stamped” Singularities, although they are undivided from each other—like the fingers on your left hand—do have actual differences between them and we interpret those differences as temporal spans, differentially interpenetrated, and that means; broadening Spans of an undivided Wholeness interpenetrating each other, but each maintaining its own individual integrity. Each Span is a dislocation of the Wholeness within and of the Wholeness, permitting a unique interpretation of the Multiverse from within each Span, each Span broadening, interpenetrating into the Multiverse, the Multiverse considered by sentient natives of each Span, to be their “Universe”. Temporal as well as spatial conditions only come about through observation, a neurological function of synthesizing the deeper reality into our Welteshung—our “World View”.

The “All-Seeing” Quantum Eye

Think about it this way; observation/analyzation is a function of inertial displacement by a Wholeness of itself and such displacement creates Temporal/Spatial perception in the Neural Perceptors (life forms), generated within and of the Wholeness. It sees itself through each and every one of us—through sentient “twists” of itself. How else could the observation by a Wholeness of itself take place? In order to make an observation, which is an analytical assessment of itself, it must displace a part of itself through a twist, a loop, a lens of itself, which is formed of a Neurological Perceptor, an Animate Interface such as each of us and every other being, within all of life, that it may see itself through—hence our perceptions through and of the Sphere of Wholeness as “Time” and “Space” (qualities of Inertia), as “Observational Displacements” by the Wholeness of itself. When we perceive, we automatically analyze…and this is through the synthesis of Space and Time, the neurological splitting of the Wholeness into interpretable parts, that we may deal with it on a cerebral level. When we act however, we do so in the moment, in the present, instantaneously, at the Quantum level, without regard to Time and Space. That which we know of “faith”, is what we do when we act…any action, is an act of faith, because all actions are instantaneous acts of Be-ing…

Allow me to take you back to Jesus, the Noumenon that the New Testament writers created to express the Phenomenon of Primary Consciousness. In one of Jesus’ “acts”
He comes across a fig tree that has born no fruit. His reaction to this impedance is to command the useless tree to “wither and die”:

“Early in the morning, as he was on his way back to the city, he was hungry. Seeing a fig tree by the road, he went up to it but found nothing on it except leaves. Then he said to it, “May you never bear fruit again!” Immediately the tree withered.” When the disciples saw this, they were amazed. “How did the fig tree wither so quickly?” they asked. Jesus replied, “I tell you the truth, if you have faith and do not doubt, not only can you do what was done to the fig tree, but also you can say to this mountain, ‘Go, throw yourself into the sea,’ and it will be done. If you believe, you will receive whatever you ask for in prayer…”~ Matthew 21:18-22

Yes, we are at one of those irritating paradoxes. The Jesus paradox must be placed on the backburner for now, for there is an even greater hidden reality to be revealed within the lines of his story for certain. For now, let us take a closer look at ourselves. Move your hand from here to there and it traverses what we acknowledge as a relatively short distance over time. But where your hand rests is always in the present, always at a “place”. Both perceptions—present and place, instant and point, are instantaneous. Between here and there, how many instantaneous places are there…and how many instants? The infinite number still adds up to zero time and zero space. The infinite number still adds up to instantaneity. Time and Space are aspects then of what we perceive as “motion”, a span of measurements, a function of analyzation. They are perceptual constructs of a deeper reality. Ok, I know to many of us this may seem a bit too much to believe. As infants we each struggled with Inertia and gravity to learn how to walk. Perhaps many of you are excellent dancers or even ice skaters? I can understand how it may seem absurd that here I am, someone who can neither dance or ice skate, questioning your solid belief that when you walk from here to there you actually think that you are “walking”? But that is exactly what I am suggesting here. This is how intrinsically deep this illusion is folks. “So what is really going on as I am “walking” from here to there?” you ask.

Essentially, your displaced mind is dividing the mind of the Wholeness, and the Wholeness is presenting to your perception its perceived divisions because you are an undivided part of it. All perceptions are displaced perspectives by an undivided Wholeness of itself. Nothing actually “moves”, but thought illuminates! —Perspectives become “active”. This is the reality that acts upon itself, stresses forming within through its attempt to solve the equation of its own self-constructed, self-driven infrastructure, creating within our neurological view, volumes and motions as an interactive manifold.

Within the Wholeness lie infinite interpretations of its structure, as perspectives by a Unified Mind of itself, capable of seeing itself simultaneously in a multiplistic way. Through self-translation, from all perceiving parts of itself, any combination of interpretations generates further perceptions through and of itself. As this is a closed system undivided from itself, any generation of perceptions affect other perceptions within. It is this ongoing generation of perspectives that are taken as the “Motion” of “Objects” through “Space” and “Time” when the interpretations are through Neural Perceptors such as ourselves.

We interpret its interactive complexities as varying velocities, Electromagnetic Radiations and states of Matter. We judge the propagation of EM radiation through Space-Time as the fastest speed possible, as a constant within our Universe, because EM Radiation is a variation, a mix of accelerations and decelerations of Space-Time itself, (an accelerating and decelerating mix of perspectives by a Unified Mind of Itself). It is therefore limited to the foundational state of Being that the Multiverse is, but we judge it through our neurological construct of “Time” and “Space”, our “classical” interpretation. Underlying this however is the instantaneity of the Wholeness, of Being undivided from itself.

“Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand…” ~Matthew 12:25

If we look deeper into the Quantum realm physicists report that they have found that light particles, (photons), act like electrons, in that photon pairs can be any “distance” from each other but still affect each other instantly. In fact, one such physicist Amit Goswami, professor of physics at the Institute of Theoretical Sciences at the University of Oregon, in his book titled The Self Aware Universe: How Consciousness Creates the Material World (of which we will analyze more later on), outlines the following Quantum properties:

• A quantum object (for example, an electron) can be at more than one place at the same time (the wave property).
• A quantum object cannot be said to manifest in ordinary space-time reality until we observe it as a particle (collapse of the wave).
• A quantum object ceases to exist here and simultaneously appears in existence over there; we [i.e. scholars and physicists] cannot say it went through the intervening space (the quantum jump).
• A manifestation of one quantum object, caused by our observation, simultaneously influences its correlated twin object—no matter how far apart they are (quantum action-at-a-distance).
[Pp. 9]


These Quantum properties seem expressly bizaar in terms of our “classical” perceptions of the way objects are to behave. Goswami pointed out that a quantum object can be at more than one place at the same time. Furthermore, we both have pointed out the fact that Quantum objects (photon pairs for example) influence one another simultaneously/instantaneously no matter how far apart they are! In order to appreciate the significance of this aspect of the Quantum realm it is important that we first understand the “classical” assumption of locality. According to Goswami, the assumption of locality is:


“…that all interactions between material objects are mediated via local signals—[an idea that] is crucial to the [“classical”] materialistic view that objects exists essentially independent and separate from one another. If, however, waves spread over vast distances and then instantly collapse when we take measurements, then the influence of our measurement is not traveling locally. Thus locality is ruled out…” [Pp.46]

Elsewhere he draws a connection between the opposite of locality—nonlocality—and the deeper meaning within the word consciousness:

“Etymologically, the word consciousness derives from the words scire (to know) and cum (with). Consciousness is “to know with”. To me, this term implies nonlocal knowing; we cannot know with somebody without sharing a nonlocal connection with that person…” [Pp. 23]

Now more specifically demonstrating nonlocality as we ourselves might experience it:

“Do we have nonlocal information processing? We can make a very good case for nonlocality if we accept our spirituality. Another controversial case for nonlocality is the claim of paranormal experiences. People through the centuries have claimed the capacity for telepathy, mind-to-mind transmission of information without local signals, and now there seems to be some scientific evidence for it…” [Pp.21]

When one considers the nonlocal action-at-a-distance behavior of light particles, or even our own consciousness, it becomes more and more clear that the speed of light therefore is not a “speed”, (as “distance” is not a “space”), but is an expression/interpretation of the existent continuity of Be-ing, of a Totality, of the singular of Primary Consciousness that we together call “Existence”. Instantaneity and Continuity, we shall see, are interactive and codependent aspects of Primary Consciousness as another interpretation of “Space-Time” or “Existent Being”—to wit, what we call the “present” is both instantaneous and continuous—as “now” ever-becoming). Because we and all other patterns are compounded of the Totality of “Existence as it is”, we interpret those patterns, including ourselves as “moving slower” than the Totality itself, (slower than instantaneity), because we each are an ordered expression of it and therefore perceive it in an ordered way. I suppose the famous pop-singer Madonna perceived this when she penned the lyrics to her song “Ray of light” which expresses how she is moving “quicker than a ray of light”. Maybe, perhaps? All the same, ordered perception is sequential and therefore we through our neurological interpretation of the Wholeness sequentially perceive parts of it, one after another, through our cerebral synthesis of “Time” and “Space”.

The Reel of Film

If we look at a reel of film lying on a table we see it in its entirety and the being of the reel itself is instantaneous, as we see it all at once (although actually you can never perceive anything all at once—some aspect is always hidden). We see the reel as a singular condition, comprised of certain qualities that unfold when viewed through a projector. When we then unroll it and view it through a projector, we see those qualities as “scenes of sequentiality”—some appearing to our senses as moving faster, some slower—depending upon their existent construct, but within the film reel itself, the constituents of the scenes already exist instantaneously as part of the being of the reel, thus only through sequential observation do the scenes themselves become sequential. The projector always turns at a constant rate of speed, faster than the speed of any of the scenes in any sequence of frames that move through the projector, enabling the illusion of scenes in motion, but those scenes generated through sequential frames are actually an outgrowth of the film reel through the projector, and must move slower than the speed of the reel/projector itself. If we move away from the mechanical motion of a projector and generate the scenes through a computer, in that we load the scenes into high memory, then the scenes are projected through the changing potentialities of the mind of the computer, which “thinks” faster than the motion of the scenes being generated. The mind of the computer then would be the “constant”, the fastest speed possible, and the scenes would be the generated attributes/thoughts of this mind, that must move slower than the mind itself.

If the film were able to project itself to itself, however, then this constant rate would be its Existent Transcendent State of Being—its Total State of Experiential Self Encounter—that judged from within any frame would appear as the fastest “speed” possible. As the frames move at a constant rate of speed, it always takes a sequence of frames to create a perceived motion. This is key, for if the reel were not unfolding, its existent state of being would still be, as the “fastest speed” that could be imagined, but that “speed” would be zero! Here we get an insight into what I believe are our false interpretations of “speed and motion”. The “fastest” speed, it seems to me, is equal to no speed at all—“instantaneity”! An existent Totality, such as our film reel, exists motionless and speedless until viewed, and then the viewer ascribes speed and motion to what is seen—from that observers own perspective. If the observer is part of the reel, then the reel is perceived as the observer’s Existent Environmental Totality, as his World, as her Universe, to which from his or her—our—perspectives, the frames and the Totality of the reel, are given relative “speed and motion”.

Thus our Existent Totality, our Universe from our classical perspective, exists at the fastest speed possible, and through our neurological constructions/interpretations of “Time” and “Space”, it “processes” at the speed of light. But we also know that the speed of light is limited to approximately 186,000 miles per second…and that “instantaneity” appears to be faster than this. This is where our classical perception fails—as “speed and motion” are purely experiential—and ultimately self-experiential. There is no acceleration in instantaneity and there is no traveling through “space”. This is coming from someone who grew up on the Southside of Chicago, who upon walking out of the front door to go to school one day his mother firmly reminded him that, “if you hear gunshots, duck your head down and run away in a zigzag [formation] in stead of a straight line.” Even so, the fact remains: Instantaneity is not a speed or motion. It is the foundation of existence compounded upon and through itself that generates our perceptions of “Classical Reality”. When “Instantaneity”, (Inertia), acts upon itself…it is a mind whose thoughts interpret from varying aspects of itself—and that is what Simultaneity/Reciprocity, from which is derived Continuity/Perpetuity is. When Instantaneity constructs neurological extensions of itself (such as we), it is viewed/experienced as a “sequential environment” by those constructs, through their ordered but limited neurological interpretations of “Time and Space”.

(The actual integrated mathematical construct of Perception through Space and Time and the further creation of Life Forms through a “space” divided by “Time” mathematical/molecular construct is described in great detail within the later chapters of this book.)

What it all boils down to is that speed and motion therefore are illusions of perception that can only be generated from within an undivided, motionless, although silently thoughtful, instantaneous Totality of Existent Being. That “motion within the frames” must always appear slower to us than the “rate of speed” of the reel as its own projector. If the film reel is its own projector, the projector need not move, but merely exist instantaneously and continuously as “now” ever-becoming through multiple perspectives of itself, rewritable and re-readable within itself, and each of the frames being different perspectives/different thoughts of the film, would interpret that film reel through their own vision of existence, as a projector, as religion continuously interprets and re-interprets “God” as the projector of the Cosmos…as science interprets the “Big Bang Theory.”

Since we in a sense ourselves perceive from within the frames, we can only judge Existence as it is in a sequential manner in that the illusion created within the frames is “slower” than the projector, as the entirety of the film—as the Totality that is a projector of itself—to itself. Any part of the reel that views the reel is in effect viewing itself. (This is quite possibly the explanation behind why the ancients were constantly comparing their gods and kings to celestial phenomenon, like stars and planets. We will explore this notion in later chapters). Perceptions of “Speed” and “Motion” are dualistic interpretations of conscious perspectives. The “viewer” looks one way and that which is viewed “moves” oppositely if that which is viewed is actually part of the viewer. Here is a simple way to observe this naturally: Walk down your street and watch the houses move oppositely to your direction of motion. You are undivided from your environment. Still unconvinced? Don’t worry.

The Projector of Existence is the Reel of Life!

The expression of a Totality, herein described as the Multiverse, is a mind expanding self-inwardly as well as self-outwardly, and as it simultaneously expresses within and of itself, it creates internal distortions as its circumference “twists” upon itself to form internal convolutions, as new “bubbles of Space-Time” emerging as “Universal Spans” within. The Wholeness of Existence is bound to itself and any part of it affects its entirety. You have heard of the saying, “A butterfly flaps its wings here and a tornado forms there”, well I am implying the same thing. It cannot “break” and become two individual parts outside of itself and therefore can only self internalize to make itself a united, diversified construct, of which its “parts” may interpret and interact with each other as varying perspectives of a “thinking environment’, within the Totality of a self-experiential mind…a Quantum Mind composed of Willful, self-experiential Inertia. This idea is expressed theologically in the New Testament where instead of applying to the Wholeness of Existence it is doctored to apply to the ecclesia—initiates called to join the “body of Christ” as opposed to the world:


“Is Christ divided?” ~ 1 Corinthians 1:13

And elsewhere,

“The body is a unit, though it is made up of many parts; and though all its parts are many, they come from one body. So it is with Christ…”~ 1 Corinthians 12:12

And again,

“…Now the body is not made up of one part but many. If the foot should say, “Because I am not a hand, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be a part of the body. And if the ear should say, “Because I am not an eye, I do not belong to the body,” it would not for that reason cease to be a part of the body. If the whole body were an eye, where would the sense of hearing be? If the whole body were an ear, where would the sense of smell be? But in fact God has arranged the parts in the body, every one of them, just as he wanted them to be. If they were all one part, where would the body be? As it is, there are many parts but one body. The eye cannot say to the hand, “I don’t need you!” And the head cannot say to the feet, “I don’t need you!” On the contrary, those parts of the body that seem to be weaker are indispensable, and the parts that we think are less honorable we treat with special honor. And the parts that are unpresentable are treated with special modesty, while our presentable parts need no special treatment. But God has given combined the members of the body and has given greater honor to the parts that lacked it, so that there should be no division in the body, but that its parts should have equal concern for each other. If one part suffers, every part suffers with it; if one part is honored, every part rejoices with it…”~ 1 Corinthians 12:14-26


Although the premises behind Paul’s (the alleged author of 1 Corinthians) teachings are sound the application is mysteriously out of context. Was this just another example of our classical perception gone awry? Or was this revision done purposefully? We will explore this in great detail in later chapters, for now we will continue to sporadically touch upon the near parallels between Quantum perceptions and the mysterious Noumenon of Jesus—whom the New Testament refers to as:

“…the image of the invisible God, the firstborn over all creation. …by him all things were created: things in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or powers or authorities; all things were created by him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. And he is the head of the body…” ~ Colossians 1:15-18

At any and every level a “World” is happening, “whether thrones or powers or authorities”. There is perception within Space-Time of “World”, and among atoms of their world, and among molecules, rocks, forests, cities, oceans, planets, stars, galaxies, galactic clusters, Universal Spans, Universal Clusters, and finally throughout the Multiverse itself…because all of it is constructed of tensioned Inertia, of Consciousness diversified in an infinity of ways. All of the levels are interactive because of the tension generated by the Wholeness upon itself. Our own planetary economic environment is a prime example, as it mirrors in its own way, on its own level, the commerce of the Cosmos. From within this mind, if we picture it as a point without size, as it experiences’ itself, it interprets from first two viewpoints, (a duality), then four, then sixteen, and on to the infinite multiplicity of mirrored views of itself. It forms of itself through such comprehension, an infrastructure of the infinite self-perspectives that are in a sense chaotically “in each other’s” and must therefore rearrange and assume a logical hierarchy of structures and levels that we interpret from tacit “Space” and “Time” to Subatomic Particles and forces on up through Atoms, Molecules, Rocks, Planets, Stars, Galaxies, Universal Spans…and finally Life. All of this however is the One Primary Consciousness, a Singular Condition, experiencing itself simultaneously, in a logical though infinite variety of ways. Since we are constructed of its “substance” we see its thoughts as manifest symbols in our reality. Its multiplicity of self-perspectives form a standing radiating sphere of inter-active self-experience within which Primary Consciousness constructs living interpretive forms of itself, (such as we), that perceive it as a “dimensional environment” within which we dwell. To this “sphere” we give a circumference as we imagine a Totality, but that “outer circumference” that we infer is actually the internalized infrastructure of a conscious mind, to which we belong, expressing itself through us, to itself.

What we conceive as “circumference” then is what we cerebrally, synthetically apply to any “object” that appears to our senses. (We are part of what we see). Thus we can imagine a “Totality” or any “object” for that matter, as having a “size”, even though that which defines it as its “boundary” is actually an emanation of its infrastructure, and as the Totality does the defining through each of us, we are thus part of the infrastructure of that Totality—undivided from the “object” and the object appears to us as having a boundary, a circumference, because Primary Consciousness—the Totality—is viewing parts of itself through each of us and the parts that are viewed then appear localized and therefore bounded.

If we approach the synthesized circumference of any object, from the size of an atom to the size of the Multiverse, we find that the “circumference” is quasi-existent, not really there. Rather, we find a series of perturbations of the interior of the object that we infer as its exterior. This is the way that through our neurological makeup an object defines itself to us…through us. So we must define a “circumference” as a self-limiting expression of an “object” of which we are a part…a self-generated boundary illusion of its internalized infrastructure from which we extend, that emanates to our senses as a “reality” of an “exterior object”.

Primary Consciousness, the “environment” from which we are undivided, draws a perspective of itself through a localization of itself…through—as I have described earlier as—a loop, a lens, an Animate Interface, and in so doing assigns a perceptual boundary, a circumference to this thought of itself because the thought has been perceptually isolated through a localized interpretation.

Examples
Here is a simple example of this: Look at any object and slowly turn your head from side to side. The object turns oppositely to match your perspective. Now stand up and slowly look around to the side of the object, now around to the back. As you look, the object graciously presents to you the part you wish to look at, but also continuously hides from you other parts of itself. Thus we can only see that which is presented and cannot see that which is hidden. If your consciousness is undivided from the object, then that which is hidden is that which is looking, for how can a Totality look upon itself and see its entirety…if part of it is doing the looking? —Thus the object looks at itself through you. How beautiful is this? All of these things that we see, are seeing themselves through us. When a baseball pitcher picks up a ball and throws it, something that a ball could not do on its own, it finds dynamic consciousness through us…and flies, and for a time…lives. All eyes in the stadium are focused on the ball as it (simultaneously/instantaneously) collides with a Louisville Slugger…going, going, gone…and following the “laws” of Inertia—(The tendency of a body to resist acceleration; the tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted on by an outside force)—the ball acts out one of many predictable scenarios:
1. It lands in the parking lot, hits the ground, bounces, and rolls to a slow halt.
2. It lands (is simultaneously/instantaneously caught) in someone’s catcher’s mitt.
3. It hits the outfield wall, then travels in the opposite direction in a “straight line”, hits the ground, bounces (implying “arc”) on the ground…etc…
From the moment the ball leaves the pitcher’s hand it is looking at itself through the perspectives of the jeering crowd, all of whom are undivided from the ball itself. Can you imagine that every single person in the crowd perceives the ball as it “moves” through “Space” over a perceived period of “Time” at a quantifiable “distance” “away” from the pitcher’s hand to its subsequent meeting with the bat onto its final course of destination—or destiny—which is rest. The object returns to “zero” speed. Who knew that America’s favorite pastime was nothing more than a giant Quantum wakeup call? (Although the same could be said for many sports and so-called leisure activities).

All of these things that we perceive, together make each of us. They come together through the interpretive neurology of our bodies and brains and achieve a united perception…and through this phenomenon there is a wonderful benefit that gets added—we each develop personalities because our brains record and re-impose back upon us “memories” (instant-replays) of these perceptions…and thus…and thus we become continuous “Beings”.

Within the instantaneous Wholeness that Primary Consciousness is….

Now, it is important to understand that what we are unveiling here already exists and we can explore it as it is. If we try to go back to the illogical notion of “before it was”, we will go nowhere, as “Time” as we perceive it, did not/does not exist at this level of reality. Let us for a moment envision “Primary Consciousness”—Inertia in its Primordial State, before our cerebral synthesis of it, as a Void without “external” boundaries and that when we take away this externalization we find the Void to have a single quality that is intrinsic to itself—and to us…and that there is nothing more to Primary Consciousness than this single quality in self-interaction, expressing within itself in an infinite variety of ways. Its “substance” is formed of a question—its cause—that instantaneously and simultaneously answers—as its effect, self-forming dualistically—Question and Answer—Plus and Minus—binding and driving its “substance” to self-exploration, self diversification, regardless of our synthetic notions of “Space” and “Time”.

Certainly, it is not always so simple as cause and effect, question and answer. In any given conversation with my girlfriend a question can be met with much resistance before any answer is produced. This is in essence an expression, on a personal level, of the Tension of Wholeness upon itself diversifying within itself, forming compounded levels that result in the creation of neurological perceptors, which on this level, we call ideas and opinions…that in turn moderate and influence behavior. (We will discuss this in greater detail in later chapters on Psychological and Sociological Patterns of Behavior). This behavior can be quantified into various degrees of communication, i.e.—conversation—debate—argument. Each of these words has essentially the same meaning yet a difference in the perceived intensity. Perhaps tension arises because she on a deeper level understands that the question is a quality that in itself contains its own answer expressing as a statement, (the function of the Wholeness arises with the Wholeness—as cause with effect)…and Existence/Primary Consciousness is nothing more than this…and that in being this, is also everything that there is, and everything that can be.

To be…or Ought to be…???
Primary Consciousness in itself is without size. It is instantaneous and simultaneous as it dwells at the quantum level as a Totality of its own infrastructure. It is “Ought”. What is “Ought”? Growing up I always considered it to be one of those words kept in the dungeon of vocabulary, chained up next to such grammatical step-children as “aint”, “fin to” (about to), and “gonna” (going to). I was pretty shocked when I came across it in a book, which so happened to shed light on the subject with an interesting synopsis of the creation of the number zero! (Yes, I read the dandiest things, I know☺). I was not so surprised however to read that once upon a time there was “no zero.” (Something I recall immediately disagreeing with). Of course—I rationalized to myself—people knew if they had nothing, but before I could jump to a pre-conclusion, the author cleared things up by aptly stating that there was no mathematical notation for zero (which does not mean that it was not rendered, let’s say—symbolically, associated with astronomical/metaphysical constructs, hint, hint). Allow me to share with you a brief excerpt from the book which I recorded in my journal:

“The first recorded zero is attributed to the Babylonians in the 3rd century BC. A long period followed when no one else used the zero placeholder. But then the Mayans, halfway around the world in Central America, independently invented zero in the fourth century CE. The final independent invention of zero in India was long debated by scholars, but seems to be set around the middle of the fifth century. It spread to Cambodia around the end of the 7th century. From India it moved into China and then to the Islamic countries. Zero finally reached Western Europe in the 12th century…”

Just reading this led me to immediately see the link between the idea of zero/nothingness—with its archaic function in philosophical and metaphysical “thought-equations”(as I like to call them)—being easily translated and used as a place value notation in mathematical equations. So, to answer the question, “What is ought?” we must first appreciate the obscurity of its terminology in that it is used to describe zero…to describe Nothingness…that has become and is continually becoming Somethingness, through its own interactive “desire”, through a question of itself whose intrinsic answer emanates as Existent Being. (This topic will be elaborated on more in the chapters dealing with Time and ancient Astronomical Calendars).

For now, let us look up Ought in the American Heritage dictionary:

1. A cipher; zero.
2. Archaic. Nothing.

The Merriam Webster Dictionary describes it further as:

“Ought-from oughte, 1st and 3rd singular, past, indicating & subject of owen—to own,
Owe—more at (Owe)—used to express obligation. (To “owe” is to be “beholden”—inherently and virtually undivided from whom you owe. Ownership in the case of Primary Consciousness is its expression to, through and of itself, as its Existent Be-ing).

<~To pay our debts>, (in this case, because Primary Consciousness is self-experiential the debt is to itself in that its own question must be answered—to be its “own self”).”

This definition of Ought in particular brings to my mind Hertha Von Deschend’s (co-author of Hamlet’s Mill) description of the figure of Hamlet in which she dutifully gives us an insight into the mysterious phenomenon behind this noumenon:

“…Here is a character deeply present to our awareness, in whom ambiguities and uncertainties, tormented self-questioning, and dispassionate insight give a presentiment of the modern mind. His personal drama was that he had to be a hero, but still try to avoid the role Destiny assigned him. His lucid intellect remained above the conflict of motives—in other words, his was and is a truly temporary consciousness. And yet this character whom the poet made one of us, the first unhappy intellectual, concealed a past as a legendary being, his features predetermined, pre-shaped by longstanding myth. There was a numinous aura around him, and many clues led up to him. But it was a surprise to find behind the mask an ancient and all-embracing cosmic power—the original master of the dreamed-of first age of the world.” ~Hamlet’s Mill [Pp. 1-2]

Von Deschend sees in Hamlet an allegory for the Primary Consciousness itself. An interesting concept when we consider all that I have set forth so far. Could it be then, that Hamlet’s Soliloquy, “To be, or not to be?” is the very question that makes each and every one of us and every “thing”—“beholden-- inherently and virtually undivided from whom you owe”—Primary Consciousness—the Unified Mind? What a tantalizing premise don’t you think? Or am I “reading” too much into “things”? It may be too early to say for certain. We will no doubt return to this idea throughout the course of the book. The Merriam Webster Dictionary has not yet revealed all of its secrets regarding this obscure term. Ought also implies:

“Advisability<~to take care of yourself>, natural expectation <~to be here by now>…”

(In the process of Be-ing…“to be” instantaneous and simultaneous—to have already arrived/happened—the cause is within the effect)

“…or logical consequence ought vt [ME oughte, 1st and 3rd singular, past indication of owen] chiefly Scot: Posses—(as in the self-possession of Primary Consciousness) chiefly Scot: (Owe) ought: moral obligation: Duty—(as the resultant dynamic Inertial potential that drives the self-experience of a Totality).

Although I have added what I feel is required to bring the above descriptions into the context of the experiential self-encounter of the singular condition of Primary Consciousness…it should be plain to the reader within the context of “Ought”, (as a Totality of “Nothingness”), both question and answer compose and dynamically drive such “Nothingness” into self engagement/self-expression. On a more “solid” level, this is no different from when a sociologist observes the impact “advanced” cultures have on “primitive” cultures. The primitive culture perceived as representing a sort of Somethingness from Nothingness—from N-Ought—and the advanced culture representative of the engaging force that drives the primitive culture towards new modes of self-expression/self-engagement…often depicted as misinterpreting the qualities and aspects of the more advanced culture (i.e. technology, etc..) and idolizing or worshipping that which they do not understand (a phenomenon known to sociologists as the “Cargo Cult Theory”). So we see, such “Zero” as self-dynamic…self-emanates as a Totality of One, for there truly is no “primitive” or “advanced” culture undivided from the Totality of the Wholeness (in this case, “humanity”).

Primary Consciousness in Experiential Self-Encounter Self Emanates as Existence

All that would add up to “One” are the internal convolutions of an intrinsic quality, as the infinite “fractions” of a Totality diversified, but undivided. Both “Zero”—(Nothingness), and “One”—(Somethingness), therefore have the same intrinsic quality of Transcendence that enables probability through the seeking of equilibrium, as the dynamics of their infrastructure. And now we come to the crux, to the origin of the spark, that transcendence that makes it all go…

Slice of the ∏

At some point in our educational careers the subject of ∏ has most certainly been encountered. Possibly you read about it in a “classical textbook” explanations such as the one I found below:


“For thousand years ago people discovered that the ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter was about 3. In nature people saw circles, great and small, and they realized that this ratio was an important tool. The Babylonians and the Egyptians used this tool. Reference is made to the concept of ∏in the Bible. The Chinese found a value of that stood for one thousand years. One man felt the accomplishment of taking ∏to 35 places was the most important achievement of his life, so much so, that he had it inscribed on his epitaph. With the help of computers ∏has been taken to over 6 billion places. People have been fascinated by ∏, an irrational number, throughout history.”~ Education & Outreach Group National Center for Supercomputing Applications


If we take a quick look at ∏ (Pi), we see that its components are (3) + (.14159 as infinitum)—as three thirds of One, (finitely expressed as the three dimensions of volume—height, width, and depth--Do I smell the precursor to the theological Noumenon known as the “Trinity” here?), plus .14159 ad infinitum—as the dynamic of One, (infinitely expressed as the fourth dimension of “time”)—as One in the experiential motion of its own self-encounter—and therefore of its continual ex-pression to, through and of itself. If we attempt to find the volume of a sphere whose radius is 1 meter, we must apply the formula 4∏R3/3 and we get 4p=12.56637 ad infinitum, times the radius cubed of 1x1x1 cubic meters as 1 cubic meter, which also = 12.56637 ad infinitum and finally we divide by 3 and get the result, 4.18879 ad infinitum cubic meters. If the “sphere” were not dynamic it would not have a curvature, (would not be a sphere), and its volume would be 4 cubic meters exactly. But as the brilliant Egyptians and other ancient megalithic masons realized, that cannot happen as all patterns of existence are curved. That’s right folks, squares, cubes, triangles, etc., all made from “straight lines, are all theoretical approximations of curves, as there are no straight lines, as there cannot be any straight lines in a dynamic Totality…as in the singular condition we call “Existence”. How can there be, if it is all undivided, all connected—if a Wholeness is dynamically opposed to itself, every part pulling or pushing on every other part—how can there be a straight line? The existence of a “straight line” in a dynamic Totality (such as in we all exist) is impossible—as the Totality is constructed of curves—and at its greatest tension—when one might assume that a straight line might come to be, a Singularity is expressed…and the stress is dissipated into a sphere emerging within the Totality!

I used to work at a cardboard box factory in Valparaiso, Indiana called Jett Corr 6. One of my responsibilities became to minimize—to the greatest extent possible—the level of warp in the board. In order to achieve this glue levels had to be thoroughly calculated formulaically and appropriately adjusted (which itself had to be constantly monitored); tension on the “belts”—which pulled the paper through the machine—had to be maintained and regulated…as well as many other processes…all of which were in essence done to create the illusion of what we called “flat board”! There was an inspector on site whose only job was to check the quality of the board—judging its “flatness” or “straightness”. So when I am looking at a box, a brick, anything cubed or with straight lines or “flatness” I know with conviction that we can detect “irregularities”. The corners are always rounded, (use a high power magnifier), the “straight lines” running up the sides, across the top, back and bottom are turned ever so slightly in and out to compensate for the intrinsic curvature of all things. From making boxes for 14 hours a day I know that a cardboard box alone can exhibit over 6 different kinds of “warp” or “irregularities”. You may not be able to see this curvature with the naked eye if the object you are looking at is well made—like Jett Corr boxes—but the curvature is throughout and can easily be detected with well-made measuring instruments or in our case we had a guy named Mel.

Moving away from the world of boxes it was easy for me to then recognize that the curvature of all things is their dynamic (.14159 ad infinitum) of Existent Be-ing—as in “to be”. Or in the form of a question seeking an answer “to be, or not to be?” We perceive “things” as existent because they are “processing”. They are mathematical expressions of a Totality seeking to solve…in the process of solving, its own equation. Curvature is an expression of dynamism, of processing, of transcendence—a furthering expression of the function of the Wholeness—arising with the Wholeness. So when we look at ∏ (Pi) in the unorthodox way that I have set forth here, we get an insight into the inseparable equation that Existence is, in that Volume cannot exist without Dynamism…Instantaneity cannot exist without Continuity/Reciprocity, (this is expressed as Simultaneity/Perpetuity)…Questioning cannot exist without answering…∏ represents Dynamic Wholeness…and we interpret this as “Space-Time”…and through our neurological synthesis of the “Fluxion” (flow) into “Space” and “Time”, we also interpret “effect” as following “cause”. Within Quantum reality however, the cause is always within the effect—at this instantaneous level.

Even the 3 “primary” colors—which we learn in pre-school—represent the “3” in ∏ as three parts in one, the “one” in this case being the “sphere” mentioned above as exactly four cubic meters without the decimal dynamic of .18879 ad infinitum and as we can “see”(or “inspect”), the curvature is missing. But then we add the “ad infinitum” of the decimal dynamic of .18879 to the four cubic meters and a curvature thus appears as its dynamism, as its ex-pressed Dynamic State of Be-ing. The decimal dynamic of .18879 is only shown here to five decimal places (no thanks to my cheap calculator), but I know that the numbers actually go on forever, radiating like (even as) standing waveforms, as “thoughts” throughout the “sphere”. They are in what we may call “directionless motion” as the continual self-processing—the transcendent “is-ness” of the Existent Be-ing of the sphere. So if someone were to ask you, “Are there some things in Existence that are not curved? The direct answer is no.

Every pattern of Existence, if even very slightly, is curved…and there is no way to classically measure a dynamic volume, (a curved pattern), except by our neurological approximation of straight lines, squares and cubes—which always leaves a “remainder”—a continuance of Be-ing—ad infinitum.


This reminds me of the Biblical concept of a remnant, to wit it is said that despite the exactness and totality of God’s judgments he always leaves a remnant. Examples of this concept is quoted below:

“But now, for a brief moment, the Lord our God has been gracious in leaving us a remnant [remainder, dynamic] and giving us a firm place in his sanctuary, and so our God gives light to our eyes and a little relief in our bondage.” ~Ezra 9:8

And here again the concept of remnant is used to convey the dynamic of Existent Be-ing, question—answering…

“God did not reject his people, whom he foreknew. Don’t you know what the Scripture says in the passage about Elijah—how he appealed to God against Israel: “Lord, they have killed your prophets and torn down your altars; I am the only one left, and they are trying to kill me”? And what was God’s answer to him? “I have reserved myself seven thousand who have not bowed the knee to Baal.” So too, at the present time there is a remnant chosen by grace.” ~Romans 11:2-5

In this passage we can clearly see the parallels between Primary Consciousness and the Biblical God in that its substance is formed of a question—its cause—that instantaneously and spontaneously answers as its effect. Like I have mentioned earlier, the question is a quality that in itself contains its own answer expressing as a statement— hence,“he foreknew”—the dynamic—because the questions, Elijah’s appeal, are merely expressions of dynamism, of processing, of Transcendence, a furthering expression of the function of the Wholeness—arising with the Wholeness. Thus the author makes Ezra or Elijah, or Job or Jonah, one of us, a neurological extension of Primary Consciousness, which is undivided from itself, in order to illustrate God’s/Primary Consciousness’ ability to draw a perspective of itself through a localization of itself…through a lens, a loop, an Animate Interface…in the Bible these are referred to as “prophets”, where as everyone else is generally referred to as “blind”, a term that expresses our “classical perception” of Quantum reality most effectively.

I have also ventured to point out that the philosophical/metaphysical/mathematical notion of dynamism can and has been used as an expression of human imperfection—“beholden” to the likeness of a perfect transcendent God. In the following passage Ezra repents for the sins of his people—taking the effects/events of their harsh captivity and the destruction of their temple to have been caused by their imperfections.

“What has happened to us is a result of our evil deeds and our great guilt, and yet, our God, you have punished us less than our sins have deserved and have given us a remnant…” ~ Ezra 9:13

I hypothesize that the idea of sin/transgression, which in Biblical terms is defined in terms of owing a debt, is actually a manifestation of our inherent nature to cloak the Quantum realm through Classical perceptions. As I have pointed out earlier, more ancient cultures, who were obsessed with notions of “Time” and “Space” invented abstract symbols and notations, like Pi and zero, which I am now saying were misperceived by later generations as expressions of God, gods, etc. This is readily discernable in Christianity as the crux of their philosophy hangs on the notion of sins being forgiven, and becoming whole (as in the sphere mentioned earlier as exactly four cubic meters without the decimal dynamic of .18879). Thus, “blind” theological interpretations of archaic astronomical and mathematical texts has driven our classical perceptions of morality and ethics for thousands of years. I will discuss this heavily in later chapters.


Thus when measuring the physical dimensions of any macrological pattern of existence, such as a rock lying on the ground, its physical dimensions cannot be known exactly because it is curved throughout, and each measurement that take leaves a remainder of its decimal dynamic. As we take finer and finer measurements we get finer and finer results until we are led to measure the subatomic particles at the extreme ends of the measurement (this is precisely how from classical physics we arrived at quantum physics!). We interpret the rock as composed of a large group of atoms, composed of an even larger group of subatomic particles and when we measure the rock’s dimensions, we are actually doing a statistical analysis of the components of the rock and approximating a “group position” of its components (this is how we arrived at quantum mechanics!) They (quantum physicists) look at the object and say, “that’s where it is”, but really they openly state that they are only approximating the “where” and the “it” and if we reflect upon the “is”, we find that the “is-ness” of macrological objects (such as we) blurs at the subatomic level as well.

Ok, we now recognize that our neurological perception of the existence of macrological objects, rocks, boxes, planets, needles, mountains, and so on is fuzzy at best, so we now cleverly go about determining their actual existence, (irregardless of our neurological interpretation), by assuming that measuring a subatomic component of such an object will be more precise and in fact exact, for what can be smaller than a subatomic particle? So the quantum physicist begins the meticulous task of pinpointing the particles at the extreme ends of the rock and looking up from his microscope says, “These are the exact extremities of one dimension of the rock”. Ok, we will pick these two extremities of the rock and call the distance between them its length. He has constructed and has used an instrument that he believes is capable of locating each of the subatomic particles at the rock’s extremities.

When he attempts to measure however, he finds that the subatomic particles at the extreme ends of the rock are no longer there to be measured! Why? In order for a subatomic particle to exist, quantum physicists originally assumed that the energy that it is composed must travel in a tight circular pattern at the—“speed of light”, and when they attempted to measure the particle, they were in effect, invading its motion/momentum”, causing it to either move from where it was, or when they tried even harder to keep track of its position while measuring they believed they altered its tight internal circular motion/pattern. Now what they thought was a particle (like a grain of sand) was no longer a “particle”, no longer there to be measured…and exact measurement eluded them once again. This is the story I hear whenever I read a book on Physics. Here is a theory—Ok, what if we measure the spaces where the particles were, but when we attempt this we find that these “spaces” only existed in relation to the particles as our own sensory/cerebral construct—as our own synthetic interpretation and reconstruction of what we imagine a “spatial pattern” to be. The “spaces” are within our own imagination and therefore we can only once again approximate their non-existent positions. This is exactly what they are doing isn’t it?

Hmmm…the quantum physicist tells us that the particles along with the spaces that they occupied dissolved when they attempted measurement. That’s funny that’s exactly what happened whenever Egon from the Ghostbusters attempted to measure Slimer’s position with their fancy “EKG meters”. Ok, seriously, let us say then that we’ll have to begrudgingly settle on using more indirect means to take a measurement. We’ll look at 10 particles at once. (Already we are settling on an approximation of “isness”). We can detect (with our “EKG meters”) that they are “there”, in an approximate array, before taking a precise measurement. We now decide to measure and lo, upon making this decision…the array changed! Must be a coincidence. Ok, we’ll try again…we look and there is the new array of ten particles, and now we decide to measure…and the array changes again. Not a coincidence. Anyone who has watched Looney Toons knows that a Wile E. Coyote cannot catch a Road Runner with Acme thing-a-ma-jigs! Each time we make a conscious decision, the physicist observed that the group of ten particles seemed to know, before he measured…that he was going to…and they moved in advance—like the Roadrunner—preventing measurement! We will discuss the radical new Quantum physics theories in later chapters which are finally beginning to acknowledge the role consciousness (such as we) and the Primary Consciousness play in the illusion that we call the material universe.

So what is causing this phenomenon? (By now you should, like Roadrunner, be able to anticipate what I am about to say.) One interpretation of this phenomenon is that at this level of existence, “Time knows no direction…that the effect comes before the cause. The true answer to this conundrum however, is that what we call “our consciousness” is undivided from the “consciousness” of the array and once again, the cause in within the effect. As we focus upon it, it simultaneously focuses upon us, as it and we are instantaneous and simultaneous expressions of the same Totality. (That which we see is that which is looking). At this level of existence, we should not be surprised to find our unity with all things—(yet this idea is completely alien to the vast majority of humanity despite what we may perceive as our richly diverse spiritual traditions). And of course, since the particles of the array are part of a greater “macrological object”, it is obvious that each particle of the array, indeed each particle of the object, is undivided from the others. If the array is moved by our thought of it, displaying unified consciousness, and the array is part of a larger group comprising a macrological object, then that object is consciousness as well. We are not able, within our limited sensory perception to detect the subatomic changes of the vast array of the object, but if we focus down to a few of its particles we find that our consciousness and its consciousness are foundationally—One.

Now, I can almost hear what you are thinking. No doubt it was one of the things that caused me to be interested in this topic to begin with:

“With this understanding, can we move an object or change a condition or rearrange a situation by our thought of it?”

Or an avid fan of science fiction media might ask more directly:

“Is mind over matter possible?”

The answer as described further into this writing is a resounding Yes! Not at our classical, neurological level of perception however, but only at the Quantum, transcendental level of thought, of which we are all capable. Indeed, as I will discuss openly at length throughout this book, there are those among us who have as Jesus so faithfully taught:


“Woe to you experts in the law, because you have taken away the key to knowledge. You yourselves have not entered, and you have hindered those who were entering…” ~Luke 11:52

And again in Matthew:

“Woe to you teachers of the law and Pharisees, you hypocrites! You shut the kingdom of heaven in men’s faces. You yourselves do not enter, nor will you let those enter who are trying to…” ~ Matthew 23:13-14

Such a stern rebuke seems warranted today to our classically conditioned individualized minds. However, it should serve as a note of caution to our subconsciousness—allow it to germinate and take root as we move on…

Expressions of Thought Within the Quantum Mind of the Totality of Primary Consciousness

“Wake up Neo…”

When our brothers, the physicists, tried to measure a single particle, it disappeared and when we tried to measure the space that it occupied, that dissolved as well because “space” only exists on the molecular projection screen of our brain. If the “space” that the particle occupied, is a synthetic cerebral construct, can “particles” as well as macrological “objects” also be synthetic constructs? Their measuring instruments told them that the particle was there, but when they tried to measure its position, the darn thing just told them the opposite. What’s the problem? Well, did anyone consider that the measuring object is also made of “particles”, (as are we), and the part of the instrument that does the actual measuring must be an array of particles that communicates to other parts of the instrument so that we may finally get a reading on its “locator screen”? The process of measuring equally affects the particles that do the actual measuring and therefore they “dissolve” or “move” within cerebral “space” as well. Within our sensory/cerebral interpretation, we describe a “particle” as never at rest and its position as changing during a measurement of its momentum and its momentum being affected during a measurement of its position. Both its position and momentum can only be approximated therefore through classical measurement. If we are to get a reasonable, workable measurement of both the positions and the momentums of the subatomic particles that comprise a macrological object in an attempt to understand its inner being, we must first visualize it as a whole, comprised of a series of undivided substructures…as an approximation of an existent object from which we are undivided, and the reason that it is “approximate”, is because it is undivided from all other “objects” at the Quantum level, including each of us. Its continuity of Be-ing is its decimal dynamic, so to speak…a transcendental number that goes on forever…and “forever” is through and of the entire infrastructure of the Totality, (the Wholeness of Primary Consciousness), from which it and we are generated.

This approach now leads us to what is called the statistical analysis, (a Quantum Mechanical interpretation), of the undivided substructures, (Molecular, Atomic, and Subatomic Particles), which gives a theoretical average approximation of the position and momentum of the group as a whole. As larger groups of smaller particles are statistically analyzed, this average approximation becomes ever more refined until it reaches a theoretical incursion into the qualities of particles themselves—no different than physically measuring a particle with a particle, “dissolving” one or both.

So, during statistical analysis we must stop analyzing where it is prudent to do so, if wish to remain in the context of “particle” analysis. But here we now find ourselves at the edge of discovering the composition/dynamics of “particles”, for if we go further, each particle is found to be composed of the qualities of both “momentum” and “position”—(a mathematical formula—an Inertial Composition of cause within effect), that blur together as a standing wave, as a “particle” of Will, (Self-Interactive Inertia), and we may now visualize the “particle” in a new way—not as an “object” of individual existence, but as a mathematical expression, undivided from and tensioned to other such mathematical expressions, (the statistical group of the Totality of Existence, of which all things, including ourselves, are a part), that presents macrologically to our neurological interpretations as “rocks lying on the ground” and all other patterns of Existence that we perceive. (Mathematical Expressions are always representative of Inertial Structures).

Now of course we have chosen the parameters of the statistical group that is being analyzed in that we have imagined a boundary/circumference around a rock and have in effect, cerebrally illusioned/imagined it as being separated from the balance of the entirety of Existence that it is actually undivided from. With this understanding we may now imagine two groups tensioned together in Dynamic Consciousness, then four, eight, sixteen,--ad infinitum…as in many rocks to make a planet, as in many astronomical objects to make a Universe.

To simplify, we must come to the realization that the entirety of Existence expresses mathematically as diverse patterns undivided from and therefore tensioned to each other within the Absolute Wholeness that Existence is. At the foundational level mathematics and inertia blend together as a singular being. What we interpret as “patterns” whether through sensory perception or through deductive reasoning, are actually expressions of mathematical “thought” of which we ourselves are composed as well. Our notions of “position” and “momentum” therefore, are our neurological, synthetic reconstructions of the thought/expressions of the “Quantum Mind” that Existence is, that appear within our view as particles, objects, spaces, and time spans—all emanated of the same Singular Inertial Willfulness in self-interaction—of which its thoughts as mathematical locutions, we perceive as macrologically and micrologically diversified “classical” patterns of Existence. Hence, at once may we realize the indeterminate expression of a “particle” through the individual thoughts of a Quantum Mind, as the function that we classically interpret/reconstruct as patterns of Existence in relative “motion”.

And the Essence of a Mind is simply its Thought of Itself in the form of a Question that contains its own Answer

“Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you. For everyone who seeks finds; and to him who knocks, the door will be opened…” ~Matthew 7:7-8


The question “What is”—is the beginning of the continuance of the seeking of equilibrium, (to find the answer)…and the intrinsic answer, which is a statement by this Nexus of itself, as its state of Being, is “I am…ever becoming!”


Here the author/authors of Exodus cryptically demonstrate their awareness of the simple mathematical expression commonly used to represent the God/Dynamic Consciousness:

Question: “Moses said to God, “Suppose I go to the Israelites and say to them, ‘The God of your fathers has sent me to you,’ and they ask me, “What is his name?’ Then what shall I tell them?”

Answer: “God said to Moses, “I AM WHO I AM (also translated as I Will Be What I Will Be). This is what you are to say to the Israelites: “I AM has sent me to you.’” ~ Exodus 3:13-14

This answer is certainly a statement by the “Nexus”—“YHVH”/Primary Consciousness—of itself through the translation of itself through a neurological life form, a translative construct of the Wholeness. Now, the often-overlooked outcome of this mathematical equation is the dynamic (ad infinitum) that occurs when someone asks Moses “Who is going to deliver us?” Moses must reply, “I AM.” So who do they believe is delivering them? Moses. The function of the Wholeness arises with the Wholeness—as cause with effect. The following chapters of Exodus are merely cryptic expressions of Primary Consciousness’ growing realization of its total state of equilibrium in continuity/perpetuity! …as its simultaneous/reciprocal mathematical proof of itself.

This formula is used by virtually all of the ancient Mystery Schools to convey these teachings to their initiates while